Considering constitutions of mind at the normative divide (of timespace)

A problems inherent with establishing a normative policy agenda for a compound at the extreme state of mental awareness. When citizens are either regular people maintaining the standards of society, or otherwise ill and under therapy, the application of systematic advance or retreat from the normative divides are herein discussed.

The endocannabinoid system feasibly regulates an ultra-state with the induction of psychotropics. Operatively achieved via a THC induced maxim state; whereby the barrier of mental coherence permeates increased phenomenological experiences. As well as inducting a maxim experience of mind the endocannabinoid system pertains to a minimum state of mind, which is regularly what we would comparatively consider as being ‘off’, but rather temporarily as per a relative maxim, in opposition or reverse. Analogously to the ignition of an engine, which both starts up and ends the systematic normative state of operation, within one’s mind the same system which regulates interactivity within ‘reality’ is considered in mechanistic materialism. That effectively determining causal relationships is the natural and normative state; the engine of ones mind in the body must be approached with certainty over the maxim and minimum marginal integrity. As the mind enables our experience of reality, the margins of extremity pertain to a participatory advance or retreat thus, and these relative margins as termed tropical conditional variance are diversely centred norms against the medium normative state. The three states being, peaked, subdued and regular, are moderated within a determined causal consistency by which monitoring and control engenders mutual understanding, trust or suspicion. 

At present the regulatory and legal framework for Cannabis brings this essential structural deterministic philosophy to light, as the fundamental approach to medicine, and foundations of society. The question being, why are individuals permitted, or not, to alter their state of mind, to pertain to a normative maxim induced by the consumption of cannabis. The answer to this question logically concerns alternatives to the endocannabinoid system too for which associative conjunctions are standard. The induction of alternative and generally more physically based altered states via the commonly termed illicit substances are isolated for their abusive capacity whereby addicts retain little common sense functions, diminutive interactivity within a normative appreciation, and often debilitated influences within a local or centre-based understanding of society. Relations of addictive substances such as amphetamines, cannot generally be prescribed to the same normative values as endocannabinoids, however closely associated and marginalised within the law. For consistency of our inquiry we can determine that the regular approach to enabling or disabling the variations of the normative divides across tropical means, is accepted as a soft or hard drug classification, whereby the normative divide is relatively extenuated, until the maxim of heroine, which will induce death upon adventation.

The logical and naturally digressive course hereby is to follow upon the inquiry of stipulating the normative divide in which regular society pertains to function. In understanding and approach to the maxim and minimum integrity with a healthy mindset, we exercise just and due prerogatives of a responsible and organised community, assuaging betterment for individuals, and the communities. The first problem we encounter in this standard is the relation of one’s mind to their body, and the standard appreciation one maintains for a mind-body. In society you’ll encounter for example, often labels like fat, ugly, beautiful, naive, cruel, or lover. Philosophically one cannot have a description without someone to appreciate it, and likewise one description can’t exist without the opposite. Love for example exists because of hate, beautiful is discerned against something ugly, and so on and so forth. This duality is at issue in the consumer based society where individuals pertain to a standard of provisioning or consumption, and are judged according to the merits of sustainability, against a relative value of existence. The judgement of being someone here and now carries such merits, and has insinuations, liability, and progressive outcomes. Interaction and participation with each other and in the ideal ‘society’ expressly differs for each individual relative to the outstanding associative value they pertain to at any given time, which we all have a relative appreciation of as unique, and hence the conceptual individuality exists within community. According a relative integrity to individuals at margin values means the subjective distinctions are limited, and cross-communal conflicts interred whereby setting and establishing limitations occurs at the differences of value-maximisation, hence profitability within the consumer based society. To pertain to a normative value is so vitally flawed, and the more complex or multi-cultural a society is, the most extremity is pertained too in order to achieve the mere normative standards each of the generations are expected to meet and further sustain. The concentrated normative evaluations are the fundamental process hence, such as Horoscorpio optionalizes within the standardised measure and scale of time space.