God in the Clouds
The ownership and available exchange of email addresses isn't a secure method of moving society 'online'. That is I mean regarding general security in the world where someone may be found at a particular place and time, defined by habits, and conditions. Starting from the difference between an online and physical address which is evermore complex regarding legality; a confounding problem at the heart of social security. Mostly as both the law, and criminal enterprise are guaranteed by this matter, where your location is assured, hence tracking you as a person for complicit duties whether and on what side of the law they may be, is assured for the most part and you may be 'held accountable'. A decadence of bureaucracy indeed, as the most problematic constraint on liberty, and where the ledger still rules even amid crypto-currency revolutions and the evolution of blockchain with almost perfect secure transactional potential. So let's take a true step back, and have a hard look over what the division is in divulging progressive advance with secure measures of exchange and whilst guaranteeing privacy (even if for criminal endeavor), so that location in time and space doesn't guarantee a criminal hostage scenario, rather backs-up the freedoms of the masses with proper legal accountability.
Firstly it's though uncomfortable to accept, the first systems we as a society are ever introduced with are a sort of kindergarten variety. With the new online environment, this day at Kindy is the email system with hardrives. Though most businesses are moved to the cloud, and we allegorically, 'socially' into primary school, it's a snails run where in actual fact all data online is relative to the cloud. Automatically hence devices are afixed to times and places, which sets the accountability structures with usernames and passwords. So can we get beyond this where we start to learn who are our classmates (in the state climate), and whose pre-prepared lunch is whose, whose art and craft is whose, and how to talk, read, learn and always whilst having fun? That is; when you open any device and you don't need to solicit it with proofs about your identity, the important stuff hits you first and of course smart logic algorithms etc... There's a few way's forward through a systematic maturity; the smart card has been championed though then neglected, and assurances of finger prints, eye scanners, face and voice recognition. These are all still basic Kindy-lessons. The only way ultimately to guarantee someone is who they say they are, when the classroom is the entire world (and soon multiple worlds) is the full chart of them as a person including every bit of information from the dawn of the creation until the predicted end. Such a chain of data can in no manor be faked, but if it could be measured, the fear remains in replicating it within the science fiction scenario, a favorite; your cyborg alter-ego.
It's ironic how like water defying gravity on the transparent surface of a glass, we replicate the secure parts of the future before it's reality. You'll find the predicative analysis to be at the heart of this security dilemma, where systems such as Horoscorpio for instance divulge a framework similarly enabling greater transparency of the future trends, but on what foundation? In proposing an ideal nature of mankind as a personified state of perfection, as is the ultimate representative Christ; this is often in praise and worship, but generally in modernity allotted to the times and place that defy our belief, which could further allow us peace of mind, calm and satiation of the pursuit to win and prosper in every situation if they were integrated moments of timespace. The basis for a healthy lifestyle, and your mental health, is after all, a balance between ambitions, desires, surrender and defeat, and those willing to surrender everything classically include the service to the most and widest social groups, communities and society. Here is where the insecurities have had the most damaging impact, in Church shooting, or Mosque bombings and why some kids in this class may still be wearing diapers. When people are at their most open and 'holy' state, to be attacked as per anarchist motivation the most influence can be imbued. This is the foundation for the consecration of a progressive online society where the freedoms from time and space would ostensibly deny any attack, but also lead to an unlimited dissolution of holiness, so much so that immunity is maintained from conflict and the vice of the evil (oft called a singularity), and an amalgamation of secure identification is directed to professional communitisation (ENG-AU).
Foremost the security infrastructure must mature, so much so that as we come and go online, when everything we do is charted. These charts would of course be able to be read by others, who may try to use you to win an election and gain power over government. This kind of dissolution can not be denied, only access to your 'file', which God in the Clouds knows is held in good hands.
Firstly it's though uncomfortable to accept, the first systems we as a society are ever introduced with are a sort of kindergarten variety. With the new online environment, this day at Kindy is the email system with hardrives. Though most businesses are moved to the cloud, and we allegorically, 'socially' into primary school, it's a snails run where in actual fact all data online is relative to the cloud. Automatically hence devices are afixed to times and places, which sets the accountability structures with usernames and passwords. So can we get beyond this where we start to learn who are our classmates (in the state climate), and whose pre-prepared lunch is whose, whose art and craft is whose, and how to talk, read, learn and always whilst having fun? That is; when you open any device and you don't need to solicit it with proofs about your identity, the important stuff hits you first and of course smart logic algorithms etc... There's a few way's forward through a systematic maturity; the smart card has been championed though then neglected, and assurances of finger prints, eye scanners, face and voice recognition. These are all still basic Kindy-lessons. The only way ultimately to guarantee someone is who they say they are, when the classroom is the entire world (and soon multiple worlds) is the full chart of them as a person including every bit of information from the dawn of the creation until the predicted end. Such a chain of data can in no manor be faked, but if it could be measured, the fear remains in replicating it within the science fiction scenario, a favorite; your cyborg alter-ego.
It's ironic how like water defying gravity on the transparent surface of a glass, we replicate the secure parts of the future before it's reality. You'll find the predicative analysis to be at the heart of this security dilemma, where systems such as Horoscorpio for instance divulge a framework similarly enabling greater transparency of the future trends, but on what foundation? In proposing an ideal nature of mankind as a personified state of perfection, as is the ultimate representative Christ; this is often in praise and worship, but generally in modernity allotted to the times and place that defy our belief, which could further allow us peace of mind, calm and satiation of the pursuit to win and prosper in every situation if they were integrated moments of timespace. The basis for a healthy lifestyle, and your mental health, is after all, a balance between ambitions, desires, surrender and defeat, and those willing to surrender everything classically include the service to the most and widest social groups, communities and society. Here is where the insecurities have had the most damaging impact, in Church shooting, or Mosque bombings and why some kids in this class may still be wearing diapers. When people are at their most open and 'holy' state, to be attacked as per anarchist motivation the most influence can be imbued. This is the foundation for the consecration of a progressive online society where the freedoms from time and space would ostensibly deny any attack, but also lead to an unlimited dissolution of holiness, so much so that immunity is maintained from conflict and the vice of the evil (oft called a singularity), and an amalgamation of secure identification is directed to professional communitisation (ENG-AU).
Foremost the security infrastructure must mature, so much so that as we come and go online, when everything we do is charted. These charts would of course be able to be read by others, who may try to use you to win an election and gain power over government. This kind of dissolution can not be denied, only access to your 'file', which God in the Clouds knows is held in good hands.
Comments
Post a Comment